I am vaguely aware of the stuff going on with the AO3 project, and tonight I saw
lim's
resignation post and it made me really sad to see.
So, this post is pointed not at AO3 or the OTW (I honestly don't know enough about them to critique), but instead I'm going to talk to the users. To people like yourself who use sites like Dreamwidth, Archive of our Own, LiveJournal, and the many others out there in the world.
These sites are made by people.They are made by people who
actively want to make your life better by giving you something awesome. I can't think of a single person in the history of my time in this industry who has wanted to make the lives of their users worse. That's just not why people do this.
Let's focus a little closer to home: on sites that have volunteers. People who usually get paid
nothing to expend many (and frequently all) of their spoons to give you something that you want. These people -- people like
lim -- are
wonderful, amazing people. In thanks for their hard work, to recompense them for all of the time and effort they've put into this project, what do we do?
We tear them down! We bash them with our words, letter by letter, until they cave. Until they give up. Until they are broken. Then what? Do we feel better? Have we really accomplished any particular goal? Now that we've driven off the person with the domain knowledge, proven ability, time, and energy to fix the problems -- who's going to fix it? Are we going to find another person who will just step right in?
My money says that the next person who considers it will go "actually, I saw what happened last time" and they won't bother to even try! Where does that leave the project? Dead in the water! End of the line! Fín! The End!
Nobody wants that to happen. None of the users want to see the project they love die. The world would be a sadder place without AO3 and what it represents. I really don't want to see them go away. But I think that, in order for them to stick around, this issue has to be addressed: how to properly care for volunteers.
(Okay, I lied, now I'm going to talk a bit about something relevant to the organization behind AO3. I will again point out that I am not intimate with this organization, so all of my knowledge is secondhand from various readings over the years.)
Part of the solution is community management. You have to have an organization willing to step in and say "look, that right there? that's not OK" when people are abusing your volunteers. This is something that LiveJournal always struggled with, honestly -- people could say whatever they wanted about the Support and Abuse teams and then go whine to Brad and it was the age old game of playing the parents off of each other. Not good.
The
bulk of this, though, is
volunteer management. People need to be cared for much like any living thing. We need food, water, and sunlight: we need to know that our efforts
matter, that we are
appreciated, that someone is
listening, and that we are
not alone.
When I was at CCP, this is something that they did really well. The community manager, kieron, was exceptional at making sure people felt like they could go to him at any time. At LiveJournal, Denise and Carrie drove that bus and we had a thriving volunteer community. On Dreamwidth, we did a fantastic job for two years, but the last year hasn't gone as well for our volunteer developers (mea culpa).
This all brings me back to my main point, though, which is addressed to everybody out there who uses things:
We are all human beings, and we all deserve to be treated with respect.If you only take one thing away from this post, let it be the previous line. Write it on your mirror. Tattoo it to your hand so that you remember it the next time your favorite site does a code update and there are bugs. These sites are made by and for people, human beings, and volunteers work out of the
goodness of their hearts.
The basic rules of human decency still apply on the Internet.